WUDC 2019 motions

Every motion we have from the 2019 World Universities Debating Championship, round by round.

  • Cape Town, South Africa
  • 2019
  • British Parliamentary
  • University
  • 9 motions

Preliminary rounds

This house, as South Africa, would forcibly break up exclusive Afrikaaner enclaves

Info slide

Afrikaaners are a white South African ethnic group descended from predominantly Dutch settlers.

This house believes that the ongoing process of decolonisation should include actively disempowering religions that were imposed on the country during colonialism

Info slide

Decolonisation refers to the process of critiquing and moving away from value systems and influences that were imposed on countries during colonialism. Some examples include: removing statues of colonial figures e.g. Cecil Rhodes, prioritising indigenous narratives of history over colonial narratives, replacing colonial authors with local authors in curricula.

Break rounds

This house believes that an approach of Political Expansionism on the part of the Chinese state is in the interests of the Chinese people

Info slide

For the purposes of this debate, 'Political Expansionism' is an approach to international relations which involves exerting pressure over and intervening in the internal affairs of other states. It seeks to spread ideology and exercise influence over the political and information environments of the targeted countries through channels such as economic investment and backing political groups.

This house believes that the WHO should adopt a convention which bans the sell of drugs with high resistance tendencies (e.g. antibiotics) to countries which do not comply with WHO guidelines regarding their medical and agricultural use

Info slide

The World Health Organisation has adopted conventions on various health topics which can impose binding regulations on member states.

ESL break rounds

For speakers of English as a second language.

In the lead up to the 1994 negotiated settlement in South Africa, this house believes that the ANC should have demanded further concessions (e.g. removing the amnesty provision in the TRC, greater land and economic rights) even at the expense of prolonging the conflict.

EFL break rounds

For speakers of English as a foreign language.

This house would grant individuals and organisations open standing to challenge the constitutionality of laws enacted by their government

Info slide

In most legal systems, in order to initiate legal proceedings, potential plaintiffs must demonstrate that they are directly involved in the issues of a case in a way that is distinct from general members of the public. this means that an ordinary citizen cannot challenge a law as unconstitutional if they cannot prove that it has, or is imminently likely to, directly affect them. A doctrine of open standing would allow anyone to initiate legal proceedings in court. Plaintiffs would still need to demonstrate a valid legal argument. For example, under the status quo, new healthcare legislation which may increase many people's premiums could not be challenged by a general member of the public. Under a doctrine of open standing it could be.

About WUDC

The World Universities Debating Championship, often called Worlds, is the largest debate tournament in the world. Hundreds of university teams debate in British Parliamentary style, with 15 minutes of prep for each motion.

Motions from a community motion archive, credited to the tournament. Prep notes are written by the Debatery Editing Team to help you start thinking; they are not the only way to run either side.